Speed Detection by Pacing in Greensville

Receiving a ticket for speeding in Greensville is a relatively common experience. Although receiving a ticket may seem like it is harmless, tickets can carry fines and may result in points on your license as well. While most speed detection methods are pretty accurate, speed detection by pacing in Greensville is a little less accurate because it relies on officer estimation as opposed to technology. If you have received a speeding ticket where law enforcement used pacing to gauge the speed of your car and you wish to challenge your ticket, seek the counsel of a knowledgeable speeding ticket lawyer.

Pacing Explained

Pacing is when a law enforcement representative uses their training and experience to visually gauge the speed of a vehicle without using more scientific methods like radar or LIDAR. Pacing is a visual estimate; the officer is basing their estimate of the speed on generally based on location. They are looking at a fixed point and how quickly the vehicle is traveling. It can vary based on whether the officer is also in motion and generally pacing is used in cases where the speed is estimated to be much higher than the posted speed limit because it is useless accuracy. Pacing is admissible evidence of speeding. Speed detection by pacing in Greensville is generally given less weight than radar and LIDAR. It is very case specific and there is a little more room to argue case to case then there is radar and LIDAR generally. The only way pacing can be proved is through the testimony of the officer.

Officers and Pacing

Officers ensure the consistency of their speed by testifying to their location – where they moving or not moving, how are they estimating the speed of the target vehicle, what was the posted speed limit, what do they estimate; the vehicle is generally at a very high speed or the officer won’t feel uncomfortable using the pacing technique.Pacing relies almost entirely on an officer’s ability to assume certain speeds. A person has to face the argument in training and experience and will have to understand how many cars over, how many years has a person essentially been caught for speeding. If a person is saying that they are essentially an expert, they can eyeball a vehicle and with some accuracy, they know what speed they are going without even using any equipment.

Pacing can be admissible evidence at any distance as long as the officer was tracking the vehicle, however, the more time that they had to observe the target vehicle, the more weight the evidence is going to be given.If the officer does not maintain consistent speed or distance from the car while tracking it, that will go towards the weight of their testimony and determine how much weight the judge gives it. In turn that will also affect how much credibility the judge defines to the officer’s testimony and ability to ascertain the speed when they could not maintain consistent speed themselves or necessarily constant contact with the vehicle. The main issue regarding speed detection by pacing in Greensville is going to be a lack of accuracy that is inherent when a person is using radar or LIDAR. The nature of pacing, in general, is kind of an estimate.

Contacting a Lawyer

Speed detection by pacing in Greensville is not the most common method of speed detection but it is still valid in court. However, there is more room for error when it comes to pacing than there is with other speed detection methods like radar and LIDAR. Receiving a potentially inaccurate speeding ticket can be a frustrating experience. If you wish to contest a speeding ticket you received from an officer who used pacing, get in contact with a local attorney whose knowledge of speeding laws will help them build you a solid defense.

N/a